tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1860307875990258501.post2934137520169370433..comments2024-02-12T09:12:21.978-06:00Comments on Non-Kantradiction: B xviii - xxii, ¶ 12Erik Christiansonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15747258914239065813noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1860307875990258501.post-3137720288596105422022-10-25T09:07:21.836-05:002022-10-25T09:07:21.836-05:00Thanks for your question.
This is a commentary on...Thanks for your question.<br /><br />This is a commentary on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and, in this passage, Kant doesn't provide a clear answer to your question. However, there are hints that this has to do with practical (moral) philosophy.<br /><br />I can say that generally, the answer for a new approach to metaphysics is to ground the propositions of metaphysics (i.e., I am free, the soul is immoral, God exists) ultimately on moral principles. The result is that Kant can show that, while we still cannot know the answer to any of these metaphysical propositions, we can show that our moral nature necessarily inclines us toward particular answers of these questions.Erik Christiansonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15747258914239065813noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1860307875990258501.post-54272278461509506802022-10-25T08:13:03.937-05:002022-10-25T08:13:03.937-05:00How does metaphysics find a new direction?
The an...How does metaphysics find a new direction? <br />The answer that you provided to this question was a bit incomprehensible can you please explain that in simple words or Terms Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com